Your staff are already pasting company data into AI tools. Leave with the rules, the approved tools and a guide people will read.
Who it's for: Leadership and IT or ops leads who need AI use to be safe, written down and enforceable.
The workshop in 1:25
Why unapproved AI use is a risk, how the three hours run and the four deliverables you receive. Captions are available in the player.
Inputs · what I need from you
Outputs · what you receive
6:21What the outputs look like · Northfork Precision
Findings, data classes, approved tools, a full AI use policy, a staff guide and a rollout plan, written for a fictional manufacturer. Plus a 6-minute walkthrough of how each piece was built.
Fictional 140-person CNC machining shop in Wyoming, Michigan
Run of show
I review your tools and policies and flag the obvious exposures.
Inventory what people actually use, including the tools nobody approved.
Classify your data and decide the rules for each class and tool.
Draft the policy language together and agree how it gets enforced.
Final policy, tools list and staff guide, walked through line by line.
Not a fit if
Questions
No. It is an operational policy written by someone who builds and secures AI systems. If you have counsel, they should review it before adoption.
The point is the opposite. A clear approved-tools list lets people use AI without asking permission every time.
Book a free 30-minute fit call. Answer three questions first so the call is useful, then pick a time on my calendar.
